A Make.com alternative for clicking and typing — not just APIs

Make (Integromat) chains API modules on a visual canvas. SkillForge automates the on-screen actions modules cannot reach — by recording them once into an agent-ready SKILL.md.

Record a UI task — free How it works

Make is modules; a lot of work is screens

Make (formerly Integromat) is a strong visual automation platform for connecting apps that expose APIs and modules. But plenty of real workflows happen in a UI that no module covers — an internal tool, a portal, a desktop app, a page with no integration.

Record the screen actions Make can't

SkillForge captures those on-screen steps from a recording and turns them into a portable SKILL.md an AI agent replays. No scenario canvas, no module hunting — and it complements Make rather than replacing it for API work.

Make vs SkillForge

 Make (Integromat)SkillForge
AutomatesAPI modules on a canvasOn-screen clicks & typing
No-API appsLimitedYes
AuthoringBuild a scenarioRecord the task
Runs in an AI agentNoYes

When to use which

Use Make for API-based, multi-step scenarios between connected apps. Use SkillForge when the task is on a screen or you want an AI agent to own it. They work well side by side.

FAQ

Is SkillForge cheaper than Make?
Recording and AI extraction are free; new accounts get 15 credits; downloads are 5 credits; subscription is $9.99/mo for 300 credits.

Can it automate apps with no API?
Yes — that is the core difference. SkillForge automates through the screen, so no-API and internal tools are fair game.

Does the output work with my AI agent?
Yes — the SKILL.md runs in Claude, ChatGPT, autogen, crewAI, browser-use, and langchain.

🌐 English · Español · Português · Français · Deutsch · Italiano · Русский · العربية · Türkçe · 中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · हिन्दी · Tiếng Việt · ไทย · Bahasa